See what supports
the story.
Check factual claims against accessible sources. Inspect corrections, review the revised article, and resolve the findings that need your judgment.
Included with every plan.See the finding. Then see what changed.
This worked example starts with an incorrect Apollo 11 crew count and shows the review, source evidence, correction, and fresh check.
Put the claim beside its source.
The example says Apollo 11 carried two astronauts. NASA’s mission record names three, so the review shows the conflict and holds publication.
The finding includes the passage, an explanation, a source link, and a suggested action.
Read NASA’s mission recordRead the finished article.
Acta identifies claims in the article, title, excerpt, metadata, FAQ, and image descriptions. Live research looks for evidence in primary sources. An independent review compares the claims with retrieved source text.
Correct, then check again.
When eligible factual findings appear, Acta attempts one targeted correction and reviews the whole revised article again. You can inspect the before-and-after changes and restore the previous draft.
- Narrow a claim to what its source supports.
- Remove an unsupported detail.
- Keep unresolved findings visible.
Let the result guide publishing.
Articles with a current pass can continue according to your publishing settings. Unresolved public claims, private experience awaiting confirmation, and incomplete checks keep publishing on hold. A manual review does not publish an article by itself.
Keep your experience in your hands.
Private client results and personal experiences cannot be independently established from public sources. You can confirm a firsthand statement with a note about its basis. This is recorded separately and cannot override an unverified or contradicted public fact.
A few things you might be wondering.
Does Editorial Review guarantee every statement is true?
No. It adds source checks and holds publication when claims remain unresolved or the check cannot finish. Automated reviewers and sources can still be wrong.
What happens if automatic correction cannot finish?
If correction or rechecking cannot finish, the original draft is kept. A completed recheck can retain useful corrections while still holding the article for unresolved findings. You can inspect changes and restore the earlier draft.
Is this the same as Acta Score?
No. Acta Score assesses writing quality and structure. Editorial Review checks claims against evidence and controls whether the current version can be published through Acta.
When does a review need to be repeated?
A review applies to one saved version and remains current for 24 hours. Changes to the article, title, excerpt, metadata, FAQ, image description, or featured image require a fresh check.
Does this cover content I copy or export?
You can copy or export a draft. Publication outside Acta is under your control. Acta requires a current review for its publishing actions, including Mark Published. Repurposed social content needs its own editorial review.
You have something worth sharing.
Give your next good idea a place to go.
Create your first article 14 days of Tribune. No card needed. Explore plans